Lost Brew in the Boiler
<editor's note> From an interchange on the Home Brew Digest …. The original post with a question, from Greg Collins … </editor's note>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:37:02 -0500 From: "Greg Collins" Subject: Lost Brew in the Boiler I am trying to figure out some way to capture that last tad bit of brew after a boil that my 15 gallon keg leaves behind in the bottom. I have tried a fitting on the back of the 1/2 ball value with 3/8 copper tubing (compression) angled down a couple of inches lower with the idea that it would siphon out some of the portion left behind. Much to my amazement, the fluid level stopped exactly in the same place as it did before. Now, really it don't take much to amaze me, but I felt like that should have worked...... How are other folks getting around this? Who knows? Maybe If I can get over this minor hurtle it may be possible to install a false bottom and pump, pitch, aerate, re-circulate, separate and filter like Jeff Renner does with his boiler......Now how's that for equipment utilization? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Greg Collins, Eastern, KY A reply from John Palmer….. Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:31:11 -0800 From: "John Palmer" Subject: Wort Reclaimation and Mashing/Lautering Inversion with HERMS Greg asks for ideas on how to reclaim the last wort from his boiler: Survey Says: A Straw. (70%) ;-) And Greg's reply to John…… Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:07:16 -0500 From: "Greg Collins" Subject: Re: Wort Reclamation Survey/Lost Brew in the Boiler Many thanks to all who responded to my "Lost Brew" question. Seems that no matter how simple the problem, folks are always eager to help. For instance, John Palmer went to the extent of conducting a survey. Even posted the #1 survey result, not to mention all the others who provided detailed instructions along with digital pictures. And too, being the concerned folks that they are, I was asked privately to report back and share my findings. So don't blame me, you asked for it.... First of all I will start with the #1 survey answer that showed 70 % opted to use a "straw". This at first did seem to be the most cost effective approach but not entirely the safest, as I will attempt to explain: During my first field trial, I noticed that an ordinary straw did not provide adequate length to fully the reach the bottom. It was near to impossible to keep both feet firmly planted on the floor and lean over far enough to reach the wort. Nevertheless, I wanted to give this idea a shot, after all, survey says right? So, I had to quickly improvise by moving my favorite brew chair over to the boiler to provide the badly needed elevation that would get me closer. That's when the unthinkable happened. As my weight shifted, so did the chair! Luckily, I caught myself before landing head first straight into to boiler. (I have read where you can drown in a teaspoon of water, you know?) Now, I wouldn't completely toss this idea out the door because a straw will provide fast access to worts final resting place. But I will advise anyone who considers this that a few safety hazards do exist, and one should be careful. It is possible that a some sort of safety harness attached to a pulley assembly located directly of the boiler could help, or if you trust your wife enough, maybe she could hold on to the back of your belt while you attempt to drain.. Still, I'm pretty sure at this point without proper safety precautions, there is an imminent possibility of drowning. Lucky for me it was only a field trial and I escaped without harm. Nevertheless, I dropped this idea and opted for the second choice. You know, the other 30% of the survey. Looking back I should have known something was up because I received no pictures pertaining to anyone using a straw. Instead, the # 2 survey result had very detailed pictures directly inline with my current system. It was recommend that any air leaking thru the fittings would quickly allow the siphon to lose its prime. Being a little reluctant by now to jump straight in, I cautiously wrapped each joint with Teflon tape and insured that each joint was tight. I then filled the boiler with enough water to adequately cover the pluming and proceeded to drain. Again, much to my amazement. IT WORKED! Wallaaa! It drained within 2.12 quarts at any flow rate! And since the other 30% of the survey provided better information, I also decided to use a "t" at the center with SS braided hose to provide a filter. How did this work? Marvelously! Although I haven't actually brewed with it yet, it held up quite well (field test #2) with a couple of quarts of spent grain/hops (some murky mess that was) that it filtered great! Now, there you have it. I am still confused a little on the #1 survey result, but at least the other 30% came thru. At this point it's hard believe those 70% but I could be convinced with a few digital pictures. Before I end this adventurous account, I will add one other thing. I'm not a tightwad! It's just good to the last drop and I want it. For anyone else is interested, I do have digital pictures of this non-breakthrough in Brewing Technology. I really appreciate the help and most of all appreciate the opportunity to post here. PS: I hate to go against the survey but if just one life is saved, it was well worth the bandwidth. Please Be Careful! Greg Collins
Back to January 2003 front page